Fire safety concerns over Scottish fire services no longer responding to automatic alarms
感谢您选择 Automatic Translation。目前,我们提供从英语到法语和德语的翻译,不久的将来还会增加更多翻译语言。请注意,这些翻译是由第三方人工智能软件服务生成的。虽然我们发现这些翻译大部分都是正确的,但并非每种情况下都完美无缺。为确保您阅读的信息正确无误,请参考英文原文。如果您发现翻译中有错误,希望引起我们的注意,请告诉我们,这将对我们大有帮助。我们一旦发现任何文字或章节有误,都会及时更正。如有任何翻译错误,请及时与我们的网站管理员联系。
Budget cuts in the Scottish fire services has led to a decision to no longer respond to automatic alarms.
BBC Scotland wrote on July 1 that fire crews from now will not attend premises such as schools, offices and places of worship unless a fire is actually confirmed.
Hospitals, care homes and other buildings where someone could be sleeping are reportedly exempt.
Automatic alarms are expensive, and allegedly make up about 80 % of the calls for the Scottish fire services. The new approach - to basically requiring a human to verify that there is fire first - is throught to reduce unnecessary call-outs, save money and free up staff for more training time.
However, some organisations have expressed concerns about the new approach. Many Scottish fire fighters are also sceptical:
SFRS group commander Steven Low said they were "big changes". The article on BBC has more from his interview.
Colin Brown, executive council member for the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) in Scotland, said to BBC Scotland;
"The changes have been proposed for a number of years. The FBU expressed some grave concerns... Firefighters are the professionals in assessing fire risk. Firefighters don't respond to unwanted fire alarm signals, they respond to a fire alarm going off, and only leave knowing it was unwanted... The concern that we have is that the responsibility for assessing that risk is now entirely on duty holders, where firefighters are trained to spot signs that duty holders may miss and lead to more developed fires and delays in fire service response..."
Photo Credit: A fire truck with the logo of the Scottish Fire Services. Photo: Annabelle Ewing, Scottish government. Creative Commons License